Women and Mammography and a Safer Approach

Last month, an independent task force came out with a new recommendation for women saying they can wait until age 50 to get their first mammogram. And even then, they said, you only need to get one every other year. Well, women everywhere ran around like chickens with their heads cut off.  Some were so confused by the latest advice that they actually seemed distraught during their prime time news interviews.  And even a national women’s health organization spoke out against the new recommendation.  For two weeks straight, the report was being debated in the media.

The sad truth is that women were up in arms because they think mammograms are the best thing out there to save lives.  That couldn’t be further from the truth! There’s a far better test out there. It’s called a thermogram.  According to some data, this highly accurate test can detect cancerous cells up to 10 years before a mammogram. Plus, there’s NO radiation involved and it doesn’t cause trauma to the breast. Unfortunately, it’s not widely available yet. But with a little luck, we’ll see mammograms go by the wayside as more and more of us learn about their shortcomings. And we’ll see an increased demand for better testing. So women, go online and search out knowledgeable physicians offering breast thermography.  My information is that the cost of the test is about the same as the one that irradiates you.

Why Dismiss Mammograms:

#1: Radiation: A mammogram is an x-ray of the breast. And it’s an established fact (though the American Cancer Society doesn’t want to admit it) that each test generates a huge dose of radiation. In fact, each “life-saving” mammogram generates 1 rad (radiation-absorbed doses) of exposure. And even just 1 rad can be harmful. The former Director of the National Cancer Institute ( Dr. Frank Raucscher) says every rad of exposure increases your lifetime risk of breast cancer by 1 percent. That’s for women ages 35 to 50. Other experts put the risk even higher. Especially if you got your first mammogram in the 1970s when each test delivered 5 to 10 rads of exposure.   Over a lifetime, you could actually increase your risk of breast cancer by 30 to 40 percent just by following your well-intentioned doctor’s advice and getting annual tests.

#2: Breast Trauma: The mammogram procedure painfully compresses a women’s breasts. This kind of intense trauma, year after year, can liberate tumor cells that your body might have kept contained.

#3: False negatives, false positives, and over diagnosis. Even the federal government’s task force has admitted that annual testing only pays off for a very small number of women in their 40s.  If you’re younger than 50, annual mammograms most often lead to false positives and unnecessary biopsies.  In women age 50 to 74, routine mammograms often lead to “over diagnosis.”  While mammograms do find small tumors in this age group of women, many of the tumors would never have caused a problem or “shortened a woman’s life.”   Laura J. Esserman, M.D., a breast surgeon, argues that mammograms often catch slow-growing types of cancer that may not need treatment. But they can miss aggressive, deadly types of cancer that need treatment. In fact, overall mammograms miss up to 20 percent of malignant breast cancer.

Dr. Allan Spreen writes about a major mammogram study conducted in Norway where researchers followed more than 200,000 women (age 50 to 64) as part of a national breast-screening program for six years. About half of the women received three mammograms during that time. The other half of the women got a single “screening mammogram” at the end of the six-year period. Researchers found that breast cancer rates were 22 percent higher among the women given regular mammograms. Did the extra mammograms actually increase the rate of breast cancer? He thinks it’s highly possible.  The Norwegian scientists seemed to think something else was going on too. They believed the second group of women actually did get cancer just as often. It’s just that some of their cancers may have “spontaneously regressed.”  The scientists believe the women who got just one mammogram developed just as many tumors. But their tumors went undiagnosed and, therefore, untreated. And given time, some of them disappeared. In other words, the body healed itself.

The report was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Yet conventional doctors still spew long-winded defenses of mammograms.

Time to educate yourselves and look for safer alternatives.  Breast Thermography is just such a too.

Monsanto Goon and the US Food Supply: Update

The following is an update report from Organic Consumer Association about how Agribusiness giant MONSANTO taints the American food supply by infiltrating our government.

President Obama has again broken his campaign promise to keep corporate lobbyists out of his administration by appointing yet another Monsanto cheerleader and pesticide lobbyist to a prominent position.

President Obama has named Islam Siddiqui to represent U.S. agricultural trade interests. Siddiqui is the current Vice-President for Science and Regulatory Affairs with CropLife America, a pesticide and biotechnology trade group known for aggressively pushing the agenda of agribusinesses, including Monsanto, Syngenta, Cargill and Dow. During Siddiqui’s term alone, CropLife has been a driving force undermining U.S. compliance with international agreements ranging from the Montreal Protocol on ozone-depleting chemicals to the Stockholm Convention, an effort to regulate the use of toxins, including DDT, PCBs and dioxins. Siddiqui’s group also publicly criticized and ridiculed Michele Obama for planting a pesticide-free organic garden at the White House.

Siddiqui first caught the Organic Consumers Association’s attention during the Clinton administration when he worked at USDA on the implementation of national organic standards. He was vocal in calling for nuclear irradiation, sewage sludge, and GMOs to be allowed in organic production. After a long campaign led by the OCA and our allies, Siddiqui and the USDA backed down.

Why would President Obama betray his ideals and organic consumers? Could the fact that Siddiqui and much of the entire chemical-biotech lobby gave Obama major campaign contributions during the 2008 campaign have anything to do with it?

Siddqui’s appointment was due for a confirmation vote in the Finance Committee on November 20. The hearing was postponed and has not yet been rescheduled. Could OCA, the 80 groups in opposition, and the 77,000 people who have signed the Stop Siddiqui petition have anything to do with it?  LEARN MORE-TAKE ACTION at ORGANIC CONSUMERS.ORG

Wim Dankbaar Shoots to Kill: The Attack on CyberSoup

Shortly after drafting my report about author fraud and the James Files-JFK assassination conspiracy tales of Wim Dankbaar from The Netherlands  — see my James Files Fiction report – other stories on the internet about Mr. Dankbaar were brought to my attention, particularly one involving a website called CyberSoup.com.  It seems Mr. Dankbaar was on a vendetta because one of the investors who had knowledge of weapons and human behavior had called the Files story a sham and James Files a liar.  The two men apparently had a business relationship of sorts, but Mr. Dankbaar decided it was best to end his personal dispute by putting an end to the company behind the man.

CyberSoup had been in business on the Internet since 1996.  It billed itself originally as a theme park and developed into a formidable social network offering free personal and business websites, online greeting cards, games and a variety of other attractions. During his relationship with the company owner, Mr. Dankbaar used CyberSoup’s business services to have a lengthy James Files interview tape edited and also used its advertising services for which he paid.   He then took it upon himself to promote his JFK assassination books and other materials through their free websites.  Mr. Dankbaar was caught spamming using CyberSoup servers causing the owner to delete his free account.  So, between the investor having called James Files a fraud and Mr. Dankbaar being found out for the massive spamming attack using the company’s servers, his revenge took hold.

Wim Dankbaar (seen here, left) used his formidable clout and good luck (living out of country, money and an endless amount of free time on his hands) to deep six the company first by harassing everyone associated with Cybersoup.  That included its bank, its partners, its investors, mere acquaintances, investor friends and family, plus one complete stranger, an ambassador who happened to live in the vicinity of one of the company’s business acquaintances.  Mr. Dankbaar did this by sending emails, writing letters and making nonstop threatening phone calls.  He then posted reprehensible and false statements on his JFK website, so that anyone doing a search on the company would be directed away from ever doing business with it or its owners/investors.  Mr.Dankbaar was quite successful at it actually.  He ranted endlessly to anyone who contacted him about his posting and called the company owners “crooks of the worst kind”.  The company subsequently lost investors and the ability to earn from its business services.  Then he sued the company and its owners, knowing full well that he had bankrupt them.

When the company tried to resurrect itself recently as a marketing firm, Mr. Dankbaar renewed his campaign, again threatening to shut it down with another lawsuit.  Now as it stands, four to five years after the original problems arose, Wim Dankbaar has resorted to blackmailing Judd McIlvain, a consumer advocate who has known CyberSoup for many years.  A woman named April Kelley (a Michigan woman) who was innocently directed to the company by Mr. McIlvain because she said she desperately needed work done repairing her online insurance agent website has now teamed with Mr. Dankbaar because of Dankbaar’s libelous website attacking Mr. Bartell.  Her excuse for aligning herself with Mr. Dankbaar was that she now believed Cybersoup was part of the vast conspiracy of internet programmers directing bad karma at her!  Huh?

It seems the company now has two dangerous lunatics after it: a rich foreigner with lots of time to wreak havoc and a karma-crazed woman who goes around the internet conning programmers into giving her free services.  She’s the one who said she was going to complain to the CIA about the bad karma attacks against her.

You may wish to continue your exploration of this story and Dankbaar’s James Files scam you may do so by visiting JamesFilesFraud.comDave’s JFK: The Files Mosaic also outlines the James Files hoax.

Visit CitizensJustice.org for more info about Wim Dankbaar’s blackmail, fraud, tactics, antics and alliance with April Kelley and her online insurance website.

CitizensforJustice.org – case reports on Wim Dankbaar

Also check out Dankbaar’s Author Fraud listing.

View my Internet Stalking Report about Dankbaar-Kelley

In 2007, Dankbaar was arrested and jailed for invasion of privacy, conspiracy, fraud and email theft against Dutch award-winning investigative reporter PETER R. DE VRIES.

Obama & Veterans’ Travel Pay

Congratulations all you clash for clunkers recipients.  You may very well be driving your lovely new car at the expense of veterans all across America.  I find it ironic that just after President Obama entered office and started doling out money to the big banks, wall street and car companies that low-income veterans entitled to travel pay so they can get to and from their medical appointments at a V.A hospital are getting the shaft.

Here’s what’s happening.  Veterans were usually recompensed in cash for travel immediately after having had their medical appointments.  Very early in the year this still occurred then as Obama gave money to the rich, those who needed it most were denied any cash compensation.  First the V.A. lowered the amount it would pay out in cash.  If a veteran’s travel pay (based upon distance traveled) was $55, for example, and the new arbitrary threshold was $50, the V.A. told the vet it would send him a check.  The turnaround time was cited as two-weeks which meant that a veteran would have to wait two weeks before he got the money he needed to get to the V.A. and back home the two weeks prior.

Soon the two-week wait became three and now it’s up to five or six. Simultaneously, the cash compensation threshold was lowered to $10 so anyone entitled to $11 in travel pay would have to wait up to six weeks!  Remember the people allowed to get the travel pay are those who have proved to be low-income.  So then the question comes, how is the veteran supposed to get to his appointments and back home if he can’t afford it?  And, of course, the answer is, he can’t.  So not only is the veteran being shafted when it comes to travel pay compensation, he’s being shafted on his medical care as well.

The bottom line here is that someone always has to pay.  In this case it’s the veterans (again).  What a disgrace.   When people say our system needs fixing they aren’t kidding.  It’s just too bad that the brain trust of America is so corrupted by corporate greed on absolutely every level that no one person or group of people can ever hope to dig out of the muck.  Our legislators are an abomination for allowing this to happen again and again and again …

Update: Dec. 24, 2009: My veteran friend tells me that just this week he learned that travel pay cash reimbursement went up to $100.  That’s terrific.  Hopefully it will last longer than just Christmas week.

James Files-Wim Dankbaar: JFK-Assassination Fiction

James Files is an American criminal sitting in prison for the attempted murder of a police officer.  His claim to fame, if you can call it that, is that for many years he has been perpetrating a hoax by insisting he was the sole assassin of President John F. Kennedy.  No one in authority believes him because his story is so full of holes it makes Swiss cheese look solid.

Wim Dankbaar, a JFK conspiracy theorist, from the Netherlands has been pushing a book, a website, a DVD and various interviews and reports on YouTube stating that the imprisoned James Files is the true and only assassin.  Below is just one story excerpt that is posted in its entirety on the website  JamesFilesFraud.com

If you like conspiracies as much as Mr. Dankbaar, perhaps you’d be interested in exploring a bit of the absurdity behind certain statements made by the biggest fraud in history: James Files.  Those who support Files are simply perpetuating his fraud for profit, not for any altruistic purpose or to  serve the annals of history.

STATEMENT 1: Files claims he was involved with the mob as part of “The Chicago Family” (by timelines after September 1960). He indicated the mob was headed by Tony Accardo and that “(Sam) Giancana was an underling to Accardo.”

THE TRUTH:  Tony Accardo turned control of the Chicago mob over to Sam “Mooney” Gianciana in the summer of 1955.

STATEMENT 2: Files claims he served in Laos with the 82nd Airborne conducting training of that countries’ soldiers in “mechanical ambushes.”

THE TRUTH:  Because of the jungle’s “triple tree canopy” airborne operations were futile. Helicopter gun ships were used instead. Additionally, he mispronounces the name given the people of Laos as Latoatians. Something which would give great offense to these proud people.

STATEMENT 3: Files claims he was recruited for CIA operations in April 1961 by David Atlee Phillips.

THE TRUTH:  In 1961 Phillips was Chief of Covert Action in Mexico City and additionally ran the CIA’s “propaganda shop.” He had nothing to do with CIA recruitment.

STATEMENT 4: Files claims responsibility for training some of the Bay of Pigs soldiers at the behest of the CIA and David Atlee Phillips. He describes the training as taking place in the Everglades.

THE TRUTH:  The preparation of invasion forces for the Bay of Pigs took place in Guatemala.

STATEMENT 5: Files indicates training for the Bay of Pigs incursion took place at No Name Key in the Everglades.

THE TRUTH:  No Name Key is located about 25 miles east of Key West and about 50 air miles across Florida Bay from the Everglades. This is a distinction that would surely be known to someone actually involved in those covert operations.

STATEMENT 6: On the morning of November 22, 1963 Files sits at a counter stool in a “pancake house just off the major highway.” He observes a meeting between Jack Ruby and John Roselli during which Ruby passes a “5X9 manila envelope” to Roselli. Later Files discovers the envelope contains “Secret Service identification and a map of the motorcade route.” Roselli quips “They only made one change.” Files reveals the alteration was the “little zig zag onto Elm they never should have made.”

THE TRUTH:  Stories of last minute changes in the motorcade route are pure fabrications. The actual route was approved on Monday, November 18, 1963 and published in both The Dallas Morning News and Dallas Times Herald on November 19, 1963 three full days before the alleged meeting between Ruby and Roselli.

STATEMENT 7: Files claims the week before Kennedy was killed, that he spent 20-30 minutes calibrating guns with scopes.

THE TRUTH:  And it takes longer that 20-30 minutes to calibrate just one gun, if you do it properly. Or maybe Files was in a hurry to see a movie.

STATEMENT 8: And Files also claims that just before shooting Kennedy he took off the scope so he could use it to look around at the people in the area. Then put the scope back on the gun to fire the fatal shot that killed Kennedy.

THE TRUTH:  Dankbaar and Files love to tell anyone who will listen, that James Files is a military/mob weapons expert and assassin. But even a gun novice knows that after calibrating a gun with a scope you do not take the scope off the weapon before a hunt, shooting competition or shooting the President of the United States, to “look around”.

STATEMENT 9: Files claims in the Dankbaar video, that he was given 6 rounds of .222 ammo, with mercury filled bullets. He fired only one that hit Kennedy and left the scene with the other 5 rounds.

THE TRUTH:  The question would be… what ammo did Mr. Files “the weapon expert” use to test fire the gun he was going to use to shoot Kennedy? So, Mr. files the “assassin” calibrates his gun and scope with ammo he won’t be using for his final target.  And by the way, the .222 cal. bullet is very small. I would love to see someone drill a hole big enough to pour mercury into the cavity and leave enough room to seal the hole with something like wax or lead. Plus, any bullet is designed by the manufacturer to follow the straightest path possible. So here is a bullet drill out so now the missing lead is replaced with mercury and wax or lead. How accurate do you think this bullet would be at a moving target???

STATEMENT 10: Files claimed he hit Kennedy by firing one shot into Kennedy’s left (that’s correct left) temple.

THE TRUTH:  The alleged “grassy Knoll” shot struck Kennedy in the right side of the head. Files claimed he fired a .222 bullet from his pistol – a Remington XP-100. Experts who own this pistol claim it’s not a good weapon in this situation. “It kicks like a mule and sounds like a cannon.” Ballistics tests, as well as, ear witnesses would certainly be able to identify the distinctive sound.

There are 3 more important statements and truths that you need to see.  For more information on this fascinating scam being perpetrated upon the public and to find out precisely how someone in the Netherlands, Wim Dankbaar, became involved and literally bought and sold the tale of the century, please read The Files Mosaic at JamesFilesFraud.com

Other Interesting Links:
Check out Wim Dankbaar’s Website Vengeance Attacks. against CyberSoup.
Check our internet stalking report on Dankbaar and his partner April Kelley.

EPA to Study 6 Dangerous Chemicals

A number of recent studies point to the increased incidence of neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease, in the United States. And the October issue of the journal Pediatrics publishes a new government study suggesting that autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder, is more prevalent than previously thought, affecting 1 in every 91 U.S. children.

A search of the literature points to exposure to manganese while self-pumping gasoline, to chronic mercury exposure, to pesticide exposure and to a myriad of unknown factors that may affect genetic expression. A research team from the California-based Parkinson’s Institute recently found that the most common pesticides used in gardening tripled the incidence of Parkinson’s disease. The NIH Website www.medlineplus.gov lists 29 published studies linking Parkinson’s disease with pesticide exposure.

The causes of neurodevelopmental disorders — including autism, ADHD and Asperger’s syndrome — remain elusive. But clearly, to quote Walter Willett, M.D, M.P.H., of Harvard’s Department of Nutrition, the fact that we’ve changed the fat in our diet has a role to play. Changes in diet and activity, the increased use of vaccines, toxins in the environment (including mercury, lead and phthalates) and genetic susceptibility to the multitude of environmental changes could affect our children, whether as individuals or collectively. The combination of factors could impact each child differently.

In an announcement September 29, 2009, the EPA noted that U.S. consumers are “understandably anxious and confused” about chemicals in the environment and in their bodies. Quoted as saying the 1976 toxics law was “inordinately cumbersome and time-consuming”, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson indicated that in the coming months the Obama administration will promote a new law placing responsibility on the chemical industry to prove that its compounds are safe.

In the interim, Jackson said, the EPA would begin to analyze and regulate six chemicals that have raised high-profile health concerns. These include bisphenol/BPA, found in hard, clear polycarbonate bottles and in dentistry materials; phthalates, found in vinyl and cosmetics; brominated flame retardants; perfluorinated compounds used in nonstick coatings; paraffins found in lubricants; and benzidine dyes and pigments. It is feared that these six chemicals mimic hormones. They have already been linked to reproductive problems, the obstruction of fetal development, cancer and other health disorders.

Using its authority under existing law, EPA may restrict the use of these six chemicals or require that product labels warn consumers of the risks associated with their use. — October 13, 2009 – Reprint From American Assn. of Health Freedom

My comment:
Notice that the report does not say that the EPA will ban these very dangerous chemicals -  only restrict and label them.  Which basically means manufacturers will still be able to kill us slowly.

Corruption at the FDA Over Dental Amalgam

Issue:  Amalgam Dental Fillings = Mercury Poisoning.

The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) website recently removed a warning that it previously reluctantly posted about the toxicity of amalgam dental fillings.  Why?  FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg holds stock in the company (Henry Schein) that makes mercury fillings and she thinks it’s okay that Americans continue to be poisoned by this proved neurotoxin.  The silver fillings placed in people’s mouths are comprised of 50% mercury.

Mercury fillings have been proven to release gases (even during normal food chewing) which travel into people’s bloodstreams and into their brains, damaging myriad organs and systems throughout the body.  Most dentists don’t know how and don’t care to learn how to safely remove the fillings.  People end up swallowing mercury chunks and breathe the fumes during the process.

The American government, the FDA, the American Dental Association (which receives billions of dollars in fees derived from holding the patent to the poison amalgam) all say it’s okay to poison people with this stuff at the same time they warn you not to eat too much fish because they may contain high levels of mercury (tuna is notorious for this).

Regarding FDA Commissioner Hamburg:

1. When Senator Enzi asked Dr. Hamburg a written question about the amalgam rule, why did she not then disclose the stock and say she would be disqualified from participating?
2.  Why, when taking office as Commissioner and still holding stock options, did she not recuse herself from participating in the rule-making right away?
3.   On what date did Margaret Hamburg ALLEGEDLY recuse herself?
4.   Did Margaret Hamburg approve any draft of the rule or approve which staff would draft it?
5.  Since Commissioner Lester Crawford was forced out of office in 2005 for conflict of interest involving stock ownership, why does Commissioner Hamburg believe this situation is different, and why does she believe she should remain in office?
6.  Why is the amalgam rule so incredibly favorable to dental products colossus Henry Schein and so unfavorable to America’s children, giving Schein the right to untrammeled amalgam sales without even a requirement that patients be told of the mercury in amalgam?

The FDA is a sham organization and so is the American Dental Association (ADA).

It is unlikely that health care reform will ever take place in this country as long as special interests rule and keep our legislators in their pockets, bribing them with election donations and gifts or threatening to destroy their re-election efforts if they oppose them.